home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: mail2news.demon.co.uk!genesis.demon.co.uk
- From: Lawrence Kirby <fred@genesis.demon.co.uk>
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
- Subject: Re: AS400 and C
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 96 23:03:46 GMT
- Organization: none
- Message-ID: <822956626snz@genesis.demon.co.uk>
- References: <DLLM8u.G2A@inter.NL.net> <4ebhnm$41m@guava.epix.net>
- Reply-To: fred@genesis.demon.co.uk
- X-NNTP-Posting-Host: genesis.demon.co.uk
- X-Newsreader: Demon Internet Simple News v1.27
- X-Mail2News-Path: genesis.demon.co.uk
-
- In article <4ebhnm$41m@guava.epix.net> hphilips@epix.net "Harry Philips" writes:
-
- >C/400 will be closer to a strict ANSI C compiler than either Borland
- >or Microsoft. For example, none of the BIOS call stuff will be there.
-
- Presumably C/400 will have its own set of system specific library functions.
- Why are these in any sense closer to 'strict ANSI C' than compiler supported
- DOS BIOS calls?
-
- --
- -----------------------------------------
- Lawrence Kirby | fred@genesis.demon.co.uk
- Wilts, England | 70734.126@compuserve.com
- -----------------------------------------
-